Consistency refers to moral theories that consider the consequences of a particular act as the basis for a valid moral judgment on that act (or that create a structure for judgment, see the follow-up of the rules). So, from the next point of view, a morally correct action is an action that produces a good result or consequence. This view is often expressed as an aphorism “Goals justify means”. Applied ethics are used in certain aspects of law and order determination and for people facing difficult decisions. Among the questions raised by applied ethics are: “Is abortion immoral?”; “Is euthanasia immoral?” “Is affirmative action right or wrong?” “What are human rights and how do we determine them?” “Do animals have rights?” and “Do individuals have the right to self-determination?”  The strength of the convictions that underlie the moral reason for an ethical strategy has argued that the only absolute good is good will, and therefore the only determining factor is whether an action is morally correct, the will or motive of the person doing it. If they act according to a bad maxim, z.B. “I`m going to lie,” then their actions are wrong, even if they have good consequences. In his essay On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns, arguing against the position of Benjamin Constant, Political Reactions, Kant states: “Therefore, a lie, defined only as a deliberately false statement to another person, does not require the additional condition of harming someone else, as required by legal experts in their definition (mendacium is falsiloquium in praeiu alterdicium). For one lie always hurts another; if not any human being, then this harms humanity in general, to the extent that it belies the very source of the right … All the practical principles of the law must contain a rigorous truth … Because such exceptions would destroy universality by virtue of which they bear the name of principles alone.  To the extent that there is a common moral consensus on just and false acts and behaviours in different cultures and countries, there is a set of universal ethical standards for which all societies, businesses and individuals can be held accountable. The point of view is essentially a fundamental reason for moral knowledge: it is the opinion that certain moral truths may be non-inferentially known (i.e. known, without the need to infer them from other truths that one believes).
Such an epistemtic vision implies that there are moral convictions with the content of Proposals; So that implies cognitivism. This is why ethical intuitionism must be contrasted with coherent approaches to the theory of moral knowledge, which depend on reflective balance.  Conceptions of good and evil, just and unjust, moral and immoral, ethical and unethical Here they think about solutions to the problem of the economy. The moral philosophy is to know the correctness and lie of a person`s action. Here we go. Which of the following is not a key issue for leaders to ask themselves when a new strategic initiative is reviewed? Together with the pragmatists Charles Sanders Peirce, William James and especially John Dewey, pragmatic ethics raises the question of whether moral correctness evolves in the same way as scientific knowledge: socially over many lives. That is why we should focus on social reform rather than taking into account the consequences, individual virtue or duty (although these may be rewarding attempts when social reform is foreseen).  If the use of a minor labour force and/or the payment of bribes/kickbacks in a given culture/society/country are acceptable, it can be argued that it is morally correct and ethical for a company to use these practices in the conduct of its activities in that culture/society/country.