In this case, the calendar lines are recorded in the internal information system, i.e. the message is not automatically transmitted to the creditor unless you establish the release of the delivery agreement (forecast or JIT delivery plan). Forecasts and JIT are two types of appointment leave. SA versions can be generated for delivery plans with output documentation. Sharing delivery plans can be done manually or automatically using a report. SA versions can be generated either for all selected items in the relevant delivery plan, or only for items for which classifications are created or modified. 2. Another thing…. The key to indicate the backlog and the immediate requirement are not displayed in its version…. (I think it should be displayed in the “Calendar Line Type” column.

although I did the SA with the creative profile that the relevant indicator for the backlog and the immediate requirement defined in the overall setting of the creative profile. Did I miss something? I have problems with the delivery plan (LPA type). I have a delivery plan in place, and I have maintained the schedule by executing the layout. The calendar can be maintained and I can run the version (generate the SA version for FRC and JIT). The publication has been directly documented (I can see it when SA`s delivery plan is displayed) and I can also print it… The problem is that the state of SA`s output documentation is always yellow (there is already information for this). As a result, the version number of this SA is still blocked at point 1, although changes in the content of the expression have taken effect (the output of the ranking line has been changed because the GR consumes SA e.V. or impact on the execution of the provision). Btw…. We solved here our problem for its version….

thx all for your kind concerns in this matter, appointments are defined and managed as documents in the system. It is possible to group these documents into different types of documents according to commercial requirements. First, you need to define the types of document and their attributes when adjusting. With SAP S/4HANA Logistics` LoB sourcing and procurement system, SAP`s best practice activation approach can be used to customize delivery plans. However, if you use the traditional approach of customizing, this blog post can be helpful. For the type of LP document, the identification plate for the output documentation is not set. For the type of LPA document, this indicator is predefined in customizing. Question: 1.

Should this be the case? If you read the library, I guess after creating the SA version and printing (among other things), the status of the old SA becomes green, and if you make changes, the release number will be increased…. They can establish a delivery plan in relation to the centrally agreed contract, which is advantageous for price negotiations, as purchases are made in large quantities. These conditions, which are mentioned in the agreement, should not change.